SC to hear review of quashing of Maya case

SC to hear review of quashing of Maya case

By: || Updated: 04 Oct 2012 08:51 AM


New
Delhi:
The Supreme Court on Thursday agreed to hear in open court a
plea for review of its judgement, which had quashed the disproportionate
assets case against former UP chief minister Mayawati.




A bench of justices P Sathasivam and Dipak Mishra put up the review
petition for hearing in courtroom on October 9.




"List the review petition in court on October 9, 2012 at 3:30 pm," said
the order uploaded on the Supreme Court website.




The review petitions are normally decided by judges in their chambers and
litigants and their counsel are not allowed to be present there.




The review petition was filed by Uttar Pradesh native Kamlesh Verma who
was an intervener in the case filed by Mayawati in the apex court for
quashing of the DA case against her.




Seeking review of the July 6 judgement, the petitioner has contended in
his petition that the apex court had decided the case merely on technical
grounds without appreciating the evidence collected by the CBI against
Mayawati.




"The judgment under review belies the requirement of the public policy
that cases of corruption by public servants cannot be dealt with by courts
with a technical approach. The public policy rather required that even if
there was some technical flaw in the investigation, the same could not
have been given precedence over the overwhelming evidence collected by the
CBI against Mayawati," the petition said.




"This court could not have simply let the accused go scot-free, thus,
rendering the evidence nothing more than bundles of waste paper," the
petition said.




In a major relief to BSP supremo Mayawati, the Supreme Court had on July 6
quashed a nine-year-long disproportionate assets case against her and had
pulled up the CBI for exceeding its jurisdiction by lodging an FIR against
her without any direction from it.




The apex court had said the DA case against Mayawati was "unwarranted" and
the agency proceeded against her without properly understanding its orders
which were confined to Taj Corridor case relating to the release of Rs 17
crore by UP government allegedly without sanction.




For INDIA News Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Google+ and for news updates download our News App.

First Published:
Next Story Hyderabad man loses vision after hair transplant