Explorer

Having boyfriends doesn't mean a woman can be sexually assaulted, says High Court

"A woman might be of easy virtue but that does not mean that all and sundry can take advantage of this fact. She has a right to say no," Justice Badar said.

MUMBAI: Taking exception to a rape convict's efforts at victim-shaming, the Bombay High Court has said a woman may have a boyfriend but that does not authorise another man to sexually assault her. In an order passed last week, Justice A M Badar denied bail to a man convicted under the Prevention Of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act for repeatedly raping his minor niece. It rejected his argument that the victim has had "two boyfriends with whom she had sexual relations". "A woman might be of easy virtue but that does not mean that all and sundry can take advantage of this fact. She has a right to say no," Justice Badar said. "Even if we were to assume that the victim in this case had two boyfriends, the same does not empower or authorise the applicant to commit penetrative sexual assault on her," he said. The judge pointed out the victim had not attained the age of consent at the time of the incident. "She has categorically stated in her cross examination that the applicant had repeatedly sexually assaulted her," he said. The man, a resident of Nashik, was convicted and sentenced by a POCSO court in 2016 to imprisonment for 10 years. He, however, approached the HC for bail arguing he had not committed the said offence and that he deserved to be let out on bail since he was the sole breadwinner for his family. "The girl (victim) did not lodge a complaint or register the First Information Report (FIR) immediately after the said incident. And even after she was taken to a shelter home, she never disclosed the crime in question to anyone there," he said. This proves the incident did not take place, he said. She also had two boyfriends with whom she had sexual relations, the man argued. Justice Badar, however, rejected his arguments and held that unavailability of another earning member in the family was not relevant grounds for the suspension of the sentence. "The offence in question is a serious one and the applicant has been held guilty of the offence after a due trial. Hence, no case for grant of bail is made out," he said.
View More
Advertisement
Advertisement
25°C
New Delhi
Rain: 100mm
Humidity: 97%
Wind: WNW 47km/h
See Today's Weather
powered by
Accu Weather
Advertisement

Top Headline

'Have To Save Our Families: PM Modi Blasts DMK Over Drug Busts In TN, Says 'BJP Enough To Fight Menace'
PM Modi Blasts DMK Over Drug Busts In TN, Says 'BJP Enough To Fight Menace'
Mukhtar Ansari Death: UP Court Orders Probe After Son Claims Father 'Poisoned' In Jail — Top Points
Mukhtar Ansari Death: UP Court Orders Probe After Son Claims Father 'Poisoned' In Jail — Top Points
I.N.D.I.A Bloc In Bihar: Here's How Congress, RJD Have Decided To Share Seats After JD-U's Exit
I.N.D.I.A Bloc In Bihar: Here's How Congress, RJD Have Decided To Share Seats After JD-U's Exit
'BJP Should Pay Rs 4,600 Crore': Congress Slams Income Tax Dept, ECI After Getting Rs 1,700-Crore Notice
'BJP Should Pay Rs 4,600 Crore': Congress Slams Income Tax Dept, ECI After Getting Rs 1,700-Crore Notice
Advertisement
for smartphones
and tablets

Videos

ABP Shikhar Sammelan 2024: Anurag Thakur's counterattack to opposition over electoral bondsABP Shikhar Sammelan 2024: Why did BJP canceled tickets of more than 100 sitting MP's?|Anurag ThakurABP Shikhar Sammelan 2024: Anurag Thakur's gets angry on TMC-Congress over remarks on Kangana RanautABP Shikhar Sammelan 2024: Anurag Thakur claims BIG WIN for BJP in upcoming Loksabha Polls

Photogallery

Embed widget